The past few days' experiences are what i imagine walking through a minefield blindfolded would feel like. i've been getting hit from all sides by all sorts of arrows, and not just on the school front. but before we delve deeper there, let me just summarize the macau trip.
day 2 of refereeing (day 4 overall) went better than the previous day. i got more bouts as the main referee! wonder if the organizers read my mind. there were a couple of things that went not-so well, though. one being i got into my first-ever golden score since the implementation of the 2014 rules. it was eventually settled by shido, as one of the contestants kept grabbing his opponent's belt. i felt that the other guy should have got the shido though, since he wasn't attacking as much or as aggressively. but well. majority of 3 rule. that was the only bout i had trouble with, i think. should probably have given shidos during normal contest time.
there was a farewell party after that, and i met a new more big names. it's good to build contacts, i think. each country had to sing a song on karaoke. since it was macau, the choice of english and japanese songs were limited. we ended up with "my heart will go on". since i had had a bit to drink, it was a bit easier to put on a show for the audience. all in good fun, right? just hope videos don't appear on youtube.
speaking of videos, a video of my refereeing was uploaded to youtube. it's a rare chance for me to see myself in action. somehow, my actual performance doesn't match up to the mental picture i had of myself performing, if that made any sense. my main areas of improvement are that i could hold my gestures for (even) longer, and generally move with more grace (a few of my movements still looked clunky). still far far away from international referee standard. but hey, there's still a lot of time to practise and get up there.
some of the kids and i went to venetian after the farewell party. it's basically a HUGE hotel/casino/shopping arcade. got a bit lost, because the taxis dropped us off at different points. so we had to kind of play around with the 2 groups of people, sending scout teams and messengers until we eventually linked up. was way more trouble than necessary, especially considering that if something like that happened in singapore, a simple phone call would have resolved everything. limitations of being abroad and being too poor (or stingy) for roaming, i guess. venetian itself was amazing! it's kind of like that place in daiba...aqua mall or something. it's fully indoors, and they use artificial lighting to simulate different times of the day. there were canals with gondolas too, but since it was after-hours, we didn't really get to ride them. walked through the casino, too. maybe i should have placed a small bet, since i came back with MOP100 left over. incidentally, i'm still wondering why the abbreviation for macau currency is MOP.
the last day was mainly spent packing, souvenir shopping, and leaving for the airport, and subsequently, singapore. you know, i think i know how to judge how good of a time i had on any given trip. there are 2 questions i'll ask myself after the trip, first being "how much do i want to come back to singapore?" and second, "how much would i have liked to extend my stay in the other country?" based on my answers, i can normally get an objective view of how much i enjoyed myself. for macau, i actually missed singapore more than if i had been in japan. probably it's the language barrier. and for some reason, i didn't really want to extend my stay there. think it's because the streets just felt a little too rustic for my liking.
it's friday now, and i'm more or less reconciled with the idea of being back in singapore and in the lab. been busy the past few days, working up 10 reactions and running 10 columns. i'll admit, it wasn't easy, especially with 2 major bombs. but now that 1 bomb has been cleared, things are kind of looking up. the cleared bomb refers to the SCDF check. i was horribly annoyed yesterday because the lab tech in charge of my labs housekeeping came by THRICE in the span of 2 hours to check on the lab's condition. and this was after i assured her i'd get it done by 8:30am today. and i delivered! even though it meant that i overnighted in school again, but still. i think it was just bad timing. i knew about the check, and was preoccupied by another bomb, and she just had to come in and add to my pressure. i actually felt like shouting at her and telling her to back off. but that hurts relationships. thank goodness i'm no longer an angry teenager. in the end, the check went smoothly. the SCDF personnel didn't go as in-depth as i was led to believe. think she was trying to scare us into cleaning the lab up properly. well now i know.
compared to the second bomb, this safety check was almost nothing. just one day after i got back, the referee director whatsapped me. the conversation started off innocently enough, usual exchange of pleasantries, asking about the refereeing trip. i started to smell a rat when he insisted on to meet me the very next day, even volunteering to come down to NUS, despite me telling him that i'd be tied up in lab. true to my suspicions, he told me that the SJF was unhappy that i had gone to macau without informing them beforehand. now here's where things get a little fuzzy. on one hand, the organizers sent a personal invitation to me, and not through the federation. that means that by right, i shouldn't have to be answerable to them at all. but from their point of view, it's an asia-level event, and since they're the governing body of judo in singapore, i think that they would have appreciated having a say in the matter, or at least being informed. i can't really argue that last point. perhaps i should have told them. but what if they refused to let me go? that would have raised a whole new bunch of issues, and was actually the primary reason i decided to just go ahead. the outcome of this is that i'm temporarily suspended from refereeing until at least next month, when the issue will be brought up at the management committee meeting. going by the calendar of events, that means i'll miss out on at least 1 event, namely the competition this coming monday (i can't remember what it's called), and maybe the adidas open next month.
you know, this is just the latest in a series of things that's making me upset with the SJF management. *DISCLAIMER: i don't like politics and am on nobody's side. i only side those who are actively trying to promote judo in singapore* first off, they cancelled kata for the SEA games next year. with that, it basically means that kata athletes have no big goal to work towards. and despite that, they still want kata athletes to attend national training. i actually see the sense in this, because even kata people need to keep fit. but i have to admit, it does us little good. there's no national kata coach. to put it bluntly, nobody qualifies. so unless we get someone from japan, all we can do is try and help each other improve...though it's hard especially when our knowledge is limited in itself.
second: they're emphasizing on shiai. it's a possible/valid path, but when the rest of the world is moving towards kata, it seems like we're headed for a crash-landing somewhere. this path would have been fine 20 or 30 years ago. not so much today. but if that's what the leadership decides, then they can go for it.
as for the refereeing thing, i didn't go to macau to show my defiance or to make a statement. i went with one goal in mind: to bring knowledge and experience back so that i can help raise the standard of refereeing in singapore, and on a more selfish note, to make some contacts in the refereeing scene. so that's actually two goals. before this trip, i thought i was pretty good, maybe ready for continental referee. but it was only after climbing out of the proverbial well that i realized that the international standard is SO much higher! if i'm one of the better referees in singapore (big if), then our standard is really quite bad on the global scale. it's not the referee director's fault; he tries to conduct seminars and refreshers regularly. it's just that we don't have any international referees on the scene...not any more, anyway. and the suspension? i feel it's uncalled for. just because i went overseas, it doesn't make me unfit to referee, or downgrade my refereeing ability in any way. if anything, it should have boosted my ability! and it's not like my refereeing is affected while this issue is in limbo, is it? to me, a more sensible "punishment" would be like refereeing a certain number of events for free. and to top it off, i hear that they're short of referees this coming event. sounds like they're cutting off the nose to spite the face to me, but it's their decision. i clarified with the referee director. i'm allowed to go as a spectator. so i guess i'll go and see how shorthanded they really are. of course, i'm not deluded enough to believe that i'm indispensable. i'm confident that the referee director will find a way to make it through. just wish that i could help him though...
even though i say that i don't want a part in politics, i somehow end up getting caught in the games. i'll be frank...i believe i'm not popular among the committee. and i disagree with a few of their policies. maybe that's why. although i "officially" didn't do anything wrong, and thus should not be subject to any official punishment, there's still the "by left" way of making life difficult for me. like referee promotion and dan grading. in fact, i was informed that my SJF A promotion had been turned down even before the whole macau thing. i personally feel that i should have been promoted a while ago, because i dare say that i'm on par with some of the existing SJF A referees. but well. sometimes, things don't go your way.
to summarize the message that the referee director gave me, it's "suck it up and keep on coming back". i agree. that's one of the best things to do, because if you give up, they win. at the same time, though, there is a limit. sometimes you hack and hack and hack away at something, but you don't see any improvement. like imagine...if my SJF A doesn't come in the next 1 to 2 years maximum, i am seriously going to make some noise. it's not even about the money; i make more from one day of research than one day of refereeing. i would even referee for free if asked! it's the fact that SJF A is a step closer to continental, and then international, which is my eventual goal.
i guess the main reason for my displeasure can be summed up in one sentence. the management doesn't know how to treat and engage its people. they want to draw lines, like "i'm the boss and you're the minion". that doesn't make for a good relationship, i feel, especially when all of us are here by choice. but well. it's just a different leadership style i guess, though it's one that i feel less comfortable with and think that it's not as effective. well...we'll see what happens in the next few years.
pretty sure there's something else, but i really can't think any more. my turn to present at group meeting tomorrow, so that's something else to dread. meanwhile, i think i'll end off here. there's always the next post, right?
day 2 of refereeing (day 4 overall) went better than the previous day. i got more bouts as the main referee! wonder if the organizers read my mind. there were a couple of things that went not-so well, though. one being i got into my first-ever golden score since the implementation of the 2014 rules. it was eventually settled by shido, as one of the contestants kept grabbing his opponent's belt. i felt that the other guy should have got the shido though, since he wasn't attacking as much or as aggressively. but well. majority of 3 rule. that was the only bout i had trouble with, i think. should probably have given shidos during normal contest time.
there was a farewell party after that, and i met a new more big names. it's good to build contacts, i think. each country had to sing a song on karaoke. since it was macau, the choice of english and japanese songs were limited. we ended up with "my heart will go on". since i had had a bit to drink, it was a bit easier to put on a show for the audience. all in good fun, right? just hope videos don't appear on youtube.
speaking of videos, a video of my refereeing was uploaded to youtube. it's a rare chance for me to see myself in action. somehow, my actual performance doesn't match up to the mental picture i had of myself performing, if that made any sense. my main areas of improvement are that i could hold my gestures for (even) longer, and generally move with more grace (a few of my movements still looked clunky). still far far away from international referee standard. but hey, there's still a lot of time to practise and get up there.
some of the kids and i went to venetian after the farewell party. it's basically a HUGE hotel/casino/shopping arcade. got a bit lost, because the taxis dropped us off at different points. so we had to kind of play around with the 2 groups of people, sending scout teams and messengers until we eventually linked up. was way more trouble than necessary, especially considering that if something like that happened in singapore, a simple phone call would have resolved everything. limitations of being abroad and being too poor (or stingy) for roaming, i guess. venetian itself was amazing! it's kind of like that place in daiba...aqua mall or something. it's fully indoors, and they use artificial lighting to simulate different times of the day. there were canals with gondolas too, but since it was after-hours, we didn't really get to ride them. walked through the casino, too. maybe i should have placed a small bet, since i came back with MOP100 left over. incidentally, i'm still wondering why the abbreviation for macau currency is MOP.
the last day was mainly spent packing, souvenir shopping, and leaving for the airport, and subsequently, singapore. you know, i think i know how to judge how good of a time i had on any given trip. there are 2 questions i'll ask myself after the trip, first being "how much do i want to come back to singapore?" and second, "how much would i have liked to extend my stay in the other country?" based on my answers, i can normally get an objective view of how much i enjoyed myself. for macau, i actually missed singapore more than if i had been in japan. probably it's the language barrier. and for some reason, i didn't really want to extend my stay there. think it's because the streets just felt a little too rustic for my liking.
it's friday now, and i'm more or less reconciled with the idea of being back in singapore and in the lab. been busy the past few days, working up 10 reactions and running 10 columns. i'll admit, it wasn't easy, especially with 2 major bombs. but now that 1 bomb has been cleared, things are kind of looking up. the cleared bomb refers to the SCDF check. i was horribly annoyed yesterday because the lab tech in charge of my labs housekeeping came by THRICE in the span of 2 hours to check on the lab's condition. and this was after i assured her i'd get it done by 8:30am today. and i delivered! even though it meant that i overnighted in school again, but still. i think it was just bad timing. i knew about the check, and was preoccupied by another bomb, and she just had to come in and add to my pressure. i actually felt like shouting at her and telling her to back off. but that hurts relationships. thank goodness i'm no longer an angry teenager. in the end, the check went smoothly. the SCDF personnel didn't go as in-depth as i was led to believe. think she was trying to scare us into cleaning the lab up properly. well now i know.
compared to the second bomb, this safety check was almost nothing. just one day after i got back, the referee director whatsapped me. the conversation started off innocently enough, usual exchange of pleasantries, asking about the refereeing trip. i started to smell a rat when he insisted on to meet me the very next day, even volunteering to come down to NUS, despite me telling him that i'd be tied up in lab. true to my suspicions, he told me that the SJF was unhappy that i had gone to macau without informing them beforehand. now here's where things get a little fuzzy. on one hand, the organizers sent a personal invitation to me, and not through the federation. that means that by right, i shouldn't have to be answerable to them at all. but from their point of view, it's an asia-level event, and since they're the governing body of judo in singapore, i think that they would have appreciated having a say in the matter, or at least being informed. i can't really argue that last point. perhaps i should have told them. but what if they refused to let me go? that would have raised a whole new bunch of issues, and was actually the primary reason i decided to just go ahead. the outcome of this is that i'm temporarily suspended from refereeing until at least next month, when the issue will be brought up at the management committee meeting. going by the calendar of events, that means i'll miss out on at least 1 event, namely the competition this coming monday (i can't remember what it's called), and maybe the adidas open next month.
you know, this is just the latest in a series of things that's making me upset with the SJF management. *DISCLAIMER: i don't like politics and am on nobody's side. i only side those who are actively trying to promote judo in singapore* first off, they cancelled kata for the SEA games next year. with that, it basically means that kata athletes have no big goal to work towards. and despite that, they still want kata athletes to attend national training. i actually see the sense in this, because even kata people need to keep fit. but i have to admit, it does us little good. there's no national kata coach. to put it bluntly, nobody qualifies. so unless we get someone from japan, all we can do is try and help each other improve...though it's hard especially when our knowledge is limited in itself.
second: they're emphasizing on shiai. it's a possible/valid path, but when the rest of the world is moving towards kata, it seems like we're headed for a crash-landing somewhere. this path would have been fine 20 or 30 years ago. not so much today. but if that's what the leadership decides, then they can go for it.
as for the refereeing thing, i didn't go to macau to show my defiance or to make a statement. i went with one goal in mind: to bring knowledge and experience back so that i can help raise the standard of refereeing in singapore, and on a more selfish note, to make some contacts in the refereeing scene. so that's actually two goals. before this trip, i thought i was pretty good, maybe ready for continental referee. but it was only after climbing out of the proverbial well that i realized that the international standard is SO much higher! if i'm one of the better referees in singapore (big if), then our standard is really quite bad on the global scale. it's not the referee director's fault; he tries to conduct seminars and refreshers regularly. it's just that we don't have any international referees on the scene...not any more, anyway. and the suspension? i feel it's uncalled for. just because i went overseas, it doesn't make me unfit to referee, or downgrade my refereeing ability in any way. if anything, it should have boosted my ability! and it's not like my refereeing is affected while this issue is in limbo, is it? to me, a more sensible "punishment" would be like refereeing a certain number of events for free. and to top it off, i hear that they're short of referees this coming event. sounds like they're cutting off the nose to spite the face to me, but it's their decision. i clarified with the referee director. i'm allowed to go as a spectator. so i guess i'll go and see how shorthanded they really are. of course, i'm not deluded enough to believe that i'm indispensable. i'm confident that the referee director will find a way to make it through. just wish that i could help him though...
even though i say that i don't want a part in politics, i somehow end up getting caught in the games. i'll be frank...i believe i'm not popular among the committee. and i disagree with a few of their policies. maybe that's why. although i "officially" didn't do anything wrong, and thus should not be subject to any official punishment, there's still the "by left" way of making life difficult for me. like referee promotion and dan grading. in fact, i was informed that my SJF A promotion had been turned down even before the whole macau thing. i personally feel that i should have been promoted a while ago, because i dare say that i'm on par with some of the existing SJF A referees. but well. sometimes, things don't go your way.
to summarize the message that the referee director gave me, it's "suck it up and keep on coming back". i agree. that's one of the best things to do, because if you give up, they win. at the same time, though, there is a limit. sometimes you hack and hack and hack away at something, but you don't see any improvement. like imagine...if my SJF A doesn't come in the next 1 to 2 years maximum, i am seriously going to make some noise. it's not even about the money; i make more from one day of research than one day of refereeing. i would even referee for free if asked! it's the fact that SJF A is a step closer to continental, and then international, which is my eventual goal.
i guess the main reason for my displeasure can be summed up in one sentence. the management doesn't know how to treat and engage its people. they want to draw lines, like "i'm the boss and you're the minion". that doesn't make for a good relationship, i feel, especially when all of us are here by choice. but well. it's just a different leadership style i guess, though it's one that i feel less comfortable with and think that it's not as effective. well...we'll see what happens in the next few years.
pretty sure there's something else, but i really can't think any more. my turn to present at group meeting tomorrow, so that's something else to dread. meanwhile, i think i'll end off here. there's always the next post, right?
-random thought of the day: Aviation!-