Cycling gave me numb fingers. so i decided yesterday was going to be the day that i cycled to the next-furthest district in the town. google maps tells me that the distance i covered (one way) was about 7km, and i took 40+ minutes at a casual-ish pace with periods of harder pedalling. not bad for my first long-distance ride! on the way back though, i felt some numbness/tingling in the last 3 fingers of my left hand. first thought: heart attack. but i figured it was something else after i didn't feel any other discomfort. a quick online search told me that it was probably due to a nerve getting pinched somewhere, probably at my wrist bones. odd thing is, i'm only having this issue on my left hand. my right hand is completely fine. well, not to worry. it'll probably resolve itself in a few days. if not, i'll have it checked out soon.
third sourdough loaf done, and i'm quite sure that i overfermented this one. it was left out for about 10 hours, all in. to add another complication, i overbaked it, and the top is basically black. but it tastes good, though! also went to splurge a bit on the fancy fermented butter. next experiment is to use less starter, but i think i'll do that later in the week. also going to change starter feeding to alternate days, because i think it's more or less established and doesn't need as much babying.
brownies are baking away in the oven as i type. with luck, they'll come out ok and in time for lunch break at the board of education (i'm on leave today). that's one more item off my "want to try" list! also for future reference, here's the recipe i used.
ingredients
200g butter
120g brown sugar
120g white sugar
100g unsweetened cocoa powder (dutch-processed optional)
~5mL vanilla essence
pinch of salt
2 eggs
80g flour
method
preheat oven to 160 190 °C
melt butter without browning it.
add sugars, cocoa, vanilla, salt, mix to combine.
add eggs one at a time, fully incorporating each one.
add flour and mix to get a homogenous batter. it should be quite thick.
line an 8-inch (~20cm) square pan with baking paper.
pour the batter in, bake until done (test doneness with toothpick in the middle).
leave to cool, and serve.
i'm having a small issue with the baking time - the recipe i'm adapting says 20 minutes, but it was still very liquid for me at that time. maybe i converted the temperature wrong. no, the recipe said 325 °F, which is approximately 160 °C. i'm going to make an executive decision and bump the temperature up to 190 °C. that works for cookies, so it should be ok for brownies too. this puts a dent in my time management today, but i figure it'll be fine. now the problem is i may have overbaked it, because my toothpick went past the wet crumbs stage and came out absolutely clean. either way i'm sure it'll taste decent, but i did want that dense, moist texture. i'll find out after it cools.
my cousin called yesterday. he's taking care of the kids while his wife is on holiday. guess he needed someone to talk to. he was telling me about this thing where a fund takes over a business, installs you as CEO, and pays you well to turn a profit. somehow, my scam sense started tingling. not that i think my cousin is trying to scam me; i trust him to place my interests before monetary gain. but it's just a "sounds too good to be true" thing, and you know what they say about those. well, i figure i'll keep an open mind. maybe he'll have some experience in it by the time i go back, and there'll be a way i can join in.
live update: brownies turned out great! moist, dense, yet airy. oxymoron, i know. i'll let them cool a bit more, then shower and bring them into the office. other tasks for today include getting the basic structures out for two more science videos.
before i forget, the biggest news that came out of the national day rally yesterday is that singapore is set to repeal section 377(a) of the constitution, the one that criminalizes sex between two men, even if it is consensual. to me, it seems to purely be a move to gain political mileage. consider this: there have been 3 or so constitutional challenges for its repeal in the last 10-20 years, and each time it's been shot down by the judge claiming "singaporeans aren't ready". what changed? why not do it earlier? i mean, i'm happy about it, but it feels disingenuous. moreover, the fact that the government has been adapting policies put forward by the opposition many years ago does nothing to dispel this image.
more than anything, i'm happy that this will shut a specific group of people up, namely the group that has no opinion of their own, and takes the law at face value. you know, those people whose opinion is purely "X is wrong because it's against the law" - nothing deeper than that. i can't stand them because the law is written by man, which means it can change! to form such a simple, un-nuanced opinion like that is a waste of brain potential. anyway, i hope that they stick to their guns - now that it's no longer illegal, they shouldn't have issues with it. to quote a pro wrestling catchphrase from the 90's - "and if they're not down with that, i got 2 words for them...suck it!" best part is that if a guy objects, sucking it actually won't be illegal soon! i'm stupidly proud of myself for coming up with that. can't wait to drop it in a conversation when the repeal is finalized!
it's not all sunshine and rainbows, though. the government also said that they would protect marriage as being between a man and a woman. so overall, it seems like this whole exercise is to throw the LGBT community a bone while appeasing the religious fundamentalists, making it a win-win for the government. honestly though, i'm fine with this personally. i don't intend to get married, so the definition of marriage doesn't affect me at all. but for LGBT couples who do want to get married, they will argue based on the premise of equal rights. and here's where i think we can afford to think outside the box. LGBT couples don't follow the mainstream. so why should we confine ourselves to campaigning for equal rights to be recognized in a marriage? instead, i think effort would be better spent pushing for civil unions/partnerships. let LGBT couples have all the benefits that hetero couples get, just call it something else. perhaps this is the wisdom that comes with age speaking, but i think we should pick our battles better, aim for minor victories instead of charging straight for the end goal. but well. i'm interested to see how this develops.
not sure when it started, but for maybe the past 3 weeks or so, i've increasingly been feeling that it might not be the worst thing in the world to return to singapore. a large part of it is due to the lifting of COVID measures - masks are soon to be required only on public transport and in healthcare facilities. in japan though, we are at wave 7 of infections, and if my news is right, japan is currently leading the world in the number of new infections. it does get tiresome to live under this atmosphere of heightened caution. at least my town is adopting a kind of "we're all in this together" mindset, so the communal suffering makes it easier. and on a related note, i just want to say how lucky i feel to have not caught COVID yet. this is in spite of travelling to tokyo and akita, the numbers in my town slowly rising, and having kids who were/have been contacts of COVID patients. of course, this is most likely to be "grass is always greener" syndrome.
is it me or is it getting dark earlier? my weather app says sunset today is set for 6:45pm, which is 45 minutes earlier than about a month ago. i hope this means that the weather will start cooling down soon, because i'm absolutely melting.
-random thought of the day: Last batch of cookies tomorrow!-
