Decided to start my year-end post a little earlier this year, instead of in the evenings/nights as i've been prone to do for the past few years. like i said, i'll post 2 drafts about the relationship which i'd written earlier in the year. in case you want to skip them, i'll indicate when they end. bear in mind that they were correct at the time which they were written, and some things have changed significantly since then.
post 1
*Started on Tuesday 13 June 2017, 01:24am*
Really hoping that this post never sees the light of day. because if it does, it probably means that the date and i have broken up. that's partially inaccurate, since we never officially got together in the first place. "that we're no longer dating" would be the best way to phrase it. i've been troubled by this over the past 2 weeks, and have met up with a few friends to discuss this and get their opinions. most of them are about the same - if the date is still uncertain after 1.5 years, they're probably not all that into me. i can see the logic and sense in this perspective, because i feel similarly too. yet, there are little things that the date does which ignite a small spark of hope. the most impactful one in recent memory was when we went for dinner to celebrate the mother's birthday. the date, being fond of taking photos, took a fair few shots of all of us. they then created a whatsapp group titled "family" to share the photos. it may not seem like much, but it was a huge deal to me. they downplayed it as usual, so i don't know by how much to be impacted by it. maybe it really was the first thing that came to mind, or the most convenient.
allow me to be selfish here. i want a partner who is as into me as i am into them. with the date, it seems that i am always the one reaching across to bridge the gap. case in point: during the drive home after saturday's date, the date asked me, "why aren't you holding my hand?" (side note: i usually have my left hand free for hand-holding, all while driving safely, of course). i didn't know how to answer then. if i were being honest, i guess my answer would be something like "because i want you to take the initiative to do it". physical touch is my strongest love language, as i think i've mentioned before. and to constantly have to ask for that kind of affection is wearing me out. to be fair, the date doesn't refuse me that often in that aspect. but being accommodating isn't the same as being proactive.
i suppose the biggest roadblock is that the date doesn't find me physically attractive enough. honestly, if i were giving advice to a friend who was in a similar predicament, i'd probably tell him to cut and run. it's not a good sign when the other party can't accept you as you are, i think. i'm reminded of my chemical engineer cousin's message to me, more than 2 years ago. "I will pray for you to be happy, healthy and well. That you will find someone someday who makes your heart sing. That you will experience all the joy of life and love. And that people will accept you for you." it's pretty self-explanatory, isn't it? right now, it seems that the date is - for lack of a better word - tolerating my negative aspects. or aspects that they deem to be negative, at any rate. i agree with some of them, but others, not so much. still, i guess i have done my best to fit into their idealized image. perhaps it's ok to not be their definition of perfect. a few of my friends have warned me not to lose sight of myself while dating. perhaps this is what they're talking about.
speaking about that, i guess that there's always been an element of imbalance in the relationship. to put it not-so-nicely, the relationship has a few double standards. again, this is purely my perspective, and whether i'm right or wrong, i believe that i'm entitled to feel the way i feel (within reason). so it seems to me that i'm giving more in the relationship. it's ok...or at least it would be, if there was an acceptable level of reciprocation. my acceptable level is probably 75:25. right now, it feels like 90:10. the date does pull their own weight in terms of finances, so i'm fine with that. i'm just not fine with the level of emotional investment that i perceive. the bare minimum of not seeing anyone else is there, and there are some perks, like i'm the only one they'll meet after a tiring day at the office. but to me, that's so easy to do! my idea of a solid sign of emotional investment would be a couples overseas trip or staycation. guess it's really difference in personality. the other thing about double standards is that the date has things which they simply won't compromise on (magic), and yet they expect me to bend my values to accommodate them. kind of a "my way or the highway" policy. my scary friend says that i'm partially to blame for this one. why? because i let the date get away with it before, and established a precedent. had i known, i would never have chased them down that new year's eve. perhaps we might have just stopped dating then.
occasionally, i wonder why the date is this way. my best hypothesis so far is that the date used to be in my shoes in their previous relationship. eager to please the ex, willing to do almost anything to keep the relationship going. and the ex basically stepped on all of that. maybe the date doesn't want to put themself in that vulnerable position again? it sounds plausible to me. at the same time, i think that the date is forgetting that i'm not the ex! i would treat their heart with so much more care. but something is making them hold back. the fear of being hurt again, i guess. you'd think that i'd have proven myself over these 1.5 years though, wouldn't you? apparently not. it makes me a bit fearful for myself. will i become like that in the future, after this experience? i really hope not, and will do everything in my power to prevent it.
examining the relationship from a practical aspect, the date and i have very few interests in common. i suppose it's because my interests are limited to lab and the occasional game. that's still not a deal-breaker. i quite disapprove of the date's penchant for changing phones frequently. i think they might have picked up on it, because just this past sunday, we went to bugis on their suggestion. they went to see a newly-launched phone, and after dinner, they led me towards the national library, which was weird because we'd usually stay within the mall. walking past a phone shop, the date turned in. i asked "are you going to buy that phone?", to which they replied "maybe". they then proceeded to give the salesperson their contact number as proof that they had preordered the phone. for some reason, this upset me a fair bit, although i didn't show it. is it so hard to be truthful to me? just say "let's go to bugis today, i've ordered a new phone". i might remind them to watch their finances, but i wouldn't refuse. besides, what could i do? make them cancel the order? it hurts a bit, to know that the date would lie about something so trivial. and on a more serious note, it makes me feel that i am there for convenience more than anything, like all i have to do is follow instructions. it's quite annoying to not be told about the big plan. it's not the first time, either. like there was once the date said that they couldn't meet me because they had something on. that "something" turned out to be collecting a phone. the explanation after that was that they didn't know how long the collection would take, and didn't want to keep me waiting. THEN WHY NOT JUST SAY THAT IN THE FIRST PLACE??? i don't understand what pleasure the date gets in withholding these little things from me. sometimes i ask, and they say that a couple should have some secrets. yes, i agree, but why keep something so trivial a secret!?? maybe i should be thankful that the secrets are of this level, instead of "i've been seeing someone behind your back" or "i actually have HIV".
you know, i've said many times before that love is a choice. and i still stand by that statement. but i think i have to develop this thought a bit more. it's easy to choose to love someone when everything is going well. it's possible to choose to love someone when the both of you are faced with external pressure, because you two are a team and can work together. although it'll be difficult, a couple can even choose to love each other when things are going rough, like during arguments. that choice is made with the faith that things will blow over soon. but for me at least, it becomes more and more difficult to choose to love someone when that person doesn't (or can't) choose to love me back. i guess i've more or less reached the end of my rope. i hope i'm not being unreasonable here. the popular opinion is that i have the patience of a saint, or am completely crazy, to be at the dating phase for 18+ months. to be honest, i more or less consider the date my partner...but it seems to be a one-way thing.
forgive me, for i am going to be very cynical here. i sometimes wonder if the date is leading me on, or just keeping me around out of convenience. maybe they think that by holding out on me, i might be motivated to chase them more aggressively, or do more things for them, or work harder to fit into their idea of "perfect", or whatever. it would work, if it was balanced well enough. in this case, it wasn't. it feels like i'm running up against a wall, you know? granted, quantum physics says that if you do it long enough, you'll eventually teleport over to the other side. but i'm not an electron. and if that's the date's idea of how to keep a relationship going, i would have to disagree. in fact, being more intimate and affectionate would increase my willingness/motivation more. i'm more receptive to positive reinforcement. besides, if i would go to the airport at 3:00am to pick one of the chemistry guys up, all the more i would do something of that magnitude for the date. there was never any need to play hard to get, or whatever this is.
to be fair, the date does make me happy. or maybe by now that "does" should be "did". i enjoyed our dates (at least those of which that we didn't argue, which is the majority), i appreciated their gifts (although i really don't need more slippers, shirts, or portable gaming devices). i actually did wonder whether the date was buying me all that stuff to make up for being unable/unwilling to speak my love languages (incidentally, receiving gifts is my weakest love language). but well, i think it's too late to think about that now. of all the things that the date has got me, guess which one i treasured the most? it was the one and only dinner that they cooked for me, late in 2015 when we agreed to give dating a second try. i've occasionally asked when it would happen again, and the answer was usually "never!". again, i don't know if it's meant as a joke, or if it was serious. whatever way it was meant, i think that the delivery could be improved.
well, i guess my path ahead is becoming clearer and clearer. it seems that this post will eventually be published, after all. now the only question is when. i'm thinking of seeing how things go until the end of the month. that sounds like a reasonable time.
post 2
*Started on Saturday 12 August 2017, 11:56pm*
Starting this post at this current point in time may not be the best idea, considering that i'm at a staycation with the partner. but then, something happened earlier today that really left me thinking, so much so that i figured i should make an attempt to look at it objectively.
the issue here is one of intimacy. physical intimacy, to be precise. the partner has been rather resistant to umm...being even more intimate than we are now. the reason i was given is that they take a while to warm up to people. just keep that at the back of your head for a minute while i digress to say that i'm a scientist, and my brain works predominantly by drawing logical conlusions from data, evidence, and historical precedents. and when there's inconistency, i can usually pick up on it. which led me to pick up on this glaring inconsistency. the partner has told me that they were intimate with the ex, and that there were several other people with whom they had been intimate while not in a relationship. that's fine and well; i'm not one to judge a person's past (too much). and here's the inconsistency - why's it taking so long with me? bear in mind that the entire relationship with their ex was about 7 months. we've been seeing each other for what, 3 times that duration? and still i'm being fed the "i'm not feeling it" line. the partner has told me to my face that they're not physically attracted to me in the past, so that could be a possible reason and they're trying not to hurt me by not mentioning it again.
if that's the case, perhaps it's a sign that the relationship won't last. yes, i know that that last sentence probably makes it sound like my sole objective is to get into the partner's pants, with no regard for their feelings. let me set the record straight. i don't think physical intimacy on that level is THE most important thing in a relationship. having said that, it is still A thing. i was doing some reading out of curiousity, and read that depriving a spouse of physical relations is grounds for a divorce. note that a gender-neutral term is used here, meaning that it applies to both husbands denying their wives, and wives denying their husbands.
i was just thinking, i wouldn't be so bothered if it was more consistent, ie. if the partner held back this much with the ex. that's why i said that i draw conclusions basd on historical precedent. i attempted to rationalize this with the partner, to which they replied "i don't see why i should follow precedent". maybe that's valid when it comes to this sort of matter? i don't know.
so anyway, all this led me to think about differences. i do believe that any two people can be in a relationship with each other, if they work hard enough at it. well, maybe not any. let's go with "most". but at the same time, i also think that it would be easier if people with more in common were to begin a relationship, as opposed to people who are polar opposites, or can't agree on major issues. like one of my friend's relationships ended because they couldn't agree on religion. is a disagreement about this physical intimacy issue significant enough to end a relationship? as it applies to us, i'd actually say yes. correct me if i'm wrong, but i don't think i'm being unreasonable. i'm not demanding it every day, or even every week. i have even tried to understand the reason(s) behind the partner's reluctance. and so far, all i've taken away is that they're simply not ready.
based on the limited amount of data i have, i can come up with the following hypotheses:
(1) the partner isn't physically attracted to me, and therefore doesn't want to be intimate.
(2) (based off of the above hypothesis) the partner is doing this to push me towards working out more and becoming more attractive.
(3) the partner doesn't feel that that kind of intimacy is essential to or needed in a relationship.
(4) (extremely unlikely, but for the sake of completeness) the partner is fulfilling that need with someone else.
if it's either (1) or (3), perhaps our difference of opinion can't be resolved. look, i'm not saying that this is something owed to me. i just don't understand the hang-up about it. and if the partner is so unable or unwilling, perhaps we should find different people who are more in line with our respective ideals.
if it's (2), i'd rather the partner come clean about it. at least it helps me to understand. and having understood it, i would say that someone with this kind of carrot-and-stick (or maybe carrot-or-no-carrot in this case) mentality towards physical intimacy is not the one for me. i don't believe in withholding affection and intimacy for a prolonged duration. and 21 months is indeed prolonged, no matter how you look at it.
to be honest, i'm getting a little frustrated at the whole situation. i'm not alone in this; the partner has voiced their frustration too, but at a different thing. they're frustrated that i keep harping on the subject. i will admit that i may have been wanting to discuss it a little too much recently, if only out of desire to understand the other point of view. i'm just afraid that all this frustration will build and evolve into resentment, at which point i think there will be no saving the situation. you know how it goes...you're so conditioned to receiving a negative reply that you simply stop attempting to address the issue. and everything goes downhill from there.
let me just add on that i still completely don't understand the partner's reluctance. we've had several conversations about this. i've asked if it was a location issue (not at home out of respect for the mother, which i understand). apparently not, because we're having our third staycation now, and things aren't happening despite it being neutral territory. it's not a health issue either (none of us have any diseases), so my conclusion is that it's all in the partner's head. that's the best i can come up with assuming i've been told nothing but the truth. and still, i don't get it. the partner says that they feel pressure. from what? to be honest, they're better-looking than me, in better shape, more experienced, so i completely don't get where the pressure is coming from. if anything, i should be the nervous wreck!
i brought up the difference between acceptance and tolerance during one of our previous conversations. not sure if i said this before, but i have felt on more than once occasion that the partner was just tolerating me. like, they don't seem "in love" with me. if that's the case, perhaps we're not the right ones for each other. being with someone should make you happy, and ideally you should embrace them for who they are. i for one believe that people should be allowed to chase their happiness (provided nobody else is hurt), and not settle for what is comfortable. the partner makes me happy, yet at the same time i think that i'm not fully happy, something that this post might have clued you in on.
for completeness' sake again, i suppose i should write about the out-of-the-box solution. so far we have (1) i bear it, (2) the partner moves things forward, (3) we break up. solution 4 is something which i have only heard about, and that's an open relationship. to be frank, i'd rather break up. the reason i say that is because my understanding of open relationships is that your body can be on the market, but your heart still belongs only to your partner. seeing as my primary love language is physical touch, i'm afraid that i'll fall for someone upon becoming intimate. that would hurt everyone all around, so no. was an interesting thought to entertain, though.
you know, i can't measure feelings or readiness, especially since they're prone to rapid fluctuation. to my scientist brain, the only objective measure i have left is time. i really think that if left alone, nothing will move. i've had a historical precedent already - i told the partner not to keep me waiting about progressing our relationship, and nothing happened until i took action months later. i have a timeframe in mind already, but let's see how things go.
END
quick executive decision...it seems that this post is already too long, so i'll publish this first, then start my year-end content in a new post. stay tuned!
-random thought of the day: Lucky I started early this year.-