Reconnecting with old friends has been a major theme of this past week. i had appointments with friends whom i haven't seen in periods ranging from a year to 8 years. before that, though, i think we'll do things in chronological order, meaning that i have to talk about the drugs test on monday.
by "drugs test", i of course don't mean a literal "pee into a cup" thing. it was the final exam of the drugs module, only that it has to be called a test and not an exam because it was before reading week. admittedly, i didn't really study that much, so i'm not setting my expectations too high. most likely i won't fail, but i'm hoping for a B- at worst, just to keep my C-less streak throughout undergrad and graduate life. it would kind of suck to get my first C on the very last module of my university life. well...i'll only know in about a month, so no point worrying about it now.
on tuesday, i met up with a friend whom i've written about a few months back. he's the one with hereditary spastic paraplegia (once again, i swear i'm not making that name up). went to his place at bukit panjang for dinner and just to hang out. now, i haven't been to bukit panjang since i stopped tutoring an SJI boy who lives there, so like for...about 3 years? it hasn't really changed, still lots of construction and road works going on. the roads were a little less straight and smooth, and so required a bit more skill. nothing the car couldn't handle, though. this particular friend of mine stays at ten mile junction, which apparently has a condo-type development above the shops. think it would be a nice place to live in in the future, once all the construction's done. so we caught up over dinner at paradise inn (i think). since the condition makes it difficult to be a naval diver, he left the SAF and is now working as a designer/facebook page manager. it suits him, since he's always been artistically-inclined. don't think i mentioned it to him that night, but i really liked his signature (which i saw when he was signing for the bill). very nice and flowy.
anyway. after dinner, we went back to his place, where he did a few tarot readings for me. he picked it up somewhere sometime somehow, and i thought it'd be interesting. although i'm sure other forces exist, i can't really be bothered to worry about whatever supernatural stuff. but i figure that as long as i keep to the terms of our agreement and don't try anything funny, everything should be ok. i asked 5 questions, with surprisingly accurate answers. but i suppose i should qualify that statement. i don't know for sure about the exact mechanisms of how tarot cards work, so i'm just going to look at it from a scientific/mathematical/statistical point of view. there are 72 (or 78? let's go with 72 until told otherwise) cards in a deck. for each reading, 3 cards are drawn, which means that the odds of drawing any given card in a reading ranges from 1 in 72 to 1 in 70. those are already quite small odds. yet, there were 2 cards that came up twice, and this was with shuffling between questions. the first card was the ace of swords, also known as the tyrant, which is associated with logic/facts and the idea of manipulation. oddly, that card came up when i asked about my love life, which then links to the idea of a marriage of convenience. that scares me more than it should. the second time it came up was linked to a question i asked about someone important to me, and that really made me review all our past interactions. more on that later. the second card that came up twice was the hermit, first when i was asking about my grad studies journey. the odd thing is that the hermit is equipped for the journey, but doesn't use his tools effectively, and is more focused on the ground before him than the journey ahead. that kind of resonates with me, since i may not pursue chemistry in the future despite having a shiny degree (if all goes well). i also told him about possibly failing either the QE or oral defence. that led to my friend saying that at my level, perhaps the only reason someone fails is because they want to fail. i wonder.
not going to go into details about the other questions, but all in all, the readings were pretty accurate. then again, i suppose that was due to 2 factors: (1) the readings themselves were kind of ambiguous, and (2) we were looking for meaning in the readings. like most stuff of this nature, tarot is very open to interpretation. for example, the statement "there is someone in your life with whom you feel a special connection" probably applies to the vast majority of people in the world. so would stuff like "the person you're asking about is burdened by some problem". but admittedly, i personally feel that the cards i got for my readings were a little too coincidental to be pure chance. the second thing is that somehow, we were trying to find the link, which introduces a factor of bias into the equation. there were a few far-fetched connections, and playing with the different definitions/meanings of the words was sometimes necessary. but still, i think ultimately, there is as much meaning in it as we choose to derive. definitely not going to live my life by the cards or anything, but it does help to discover new perspectives and challenge your previous thoughts.
wednesday's dinner was judo-related, and that's probably all i can say about it. actually, the photos are all on facebook already, so what the hell. we met up with someone who's quite unpopular with the current federation management. then again, everyone who was at that table is unpopular with the current federation management, so that's not really saying much. i received some advice regarding my refereeing future, which is to wait until at least 30 years old to take the continental exam. it seems that failing due to (being under)age is a very real possibility. and besides, even with the macau experience, i don't think i'm good enough to take the exam yet. still have to improve on my gestures (more grace needed), my score awarding (more accuracy needed), and my knowledge of the rules (more needed, period). given my current indefinite suspension, and the SEA games next year (no national referees allowed) though, i wonder how i'm going to get the practice in. will have to find a way.
going to skip thursday and friday because nothing really interesting happened. that brings us to yesterday, where i didn't catch up with old friends, but made new ones over coffee. that was also the day that i found out that 2 starbucks drinks within 7 hours is a bit too much for my body to handle. to put that into perspective, i only drink coffee like less than 5 times a year. those 5 times are usually concentrated in the november/december period, when starbucks has the holiday drink thing going on. incidentally, i realize that out of the 5 times total that i've ordered my favourite drink (the holiday peppermint mocha with all the add-ons, but with only one modification: change mocha to dark mocha) this year and last year, i've only got the exact perfect order once. the other 4 times, i've had to talk to the barista because they'd not get the idea, or not give me candy cane sprinkles/chocolate. yes i know it's unhealthy, but it's only a few times a year. probably won't die. umm...i lost track of my thoughts. oh, right. making new friends. it's not the right time to go into details yet, and i'm actually not sure if there will ever be a right time. so for now, i guess i'll just say that i quite enjoyed it, which is quite uncharacteristic of antisocial me.
after a brief trip to lab (to wash glassware and set up a reaction) and judo, i met with a JC schoolmate whom i haven't seen since graduation. my nickname for her in JC was "scary", and it somehow stuck. we ate at manhattan fish market at J8, and the standard of service just keeps dropping with each visit. the place was like 40% full maximum, and we still had to remind them when they forgot an item on our order. and the staff were a little...not exactly rude, but they could have acknowledged us a little more, and with a bit more...gentleness? whatever. the food was decent, though. over dinner, we caught each other up on stuff that's been going on...stuff like me doing grad studies, her having a boyfriend (who was also present), what some of our mutual friends are now doing...things that you'd talk about after a gap of 8 years. hopefully we won't wait another 8 years to meet up again.
could have been because of the drugs test, but this past week was really bad for lab...like, i didn't have the motivation to do anything, and only set up at most 1 reaction a day, compared to the previous week's 2 to 3. guess i'll have to shake myself out of it and get back to doing more. i swear, if i can't get the substrate out, my head will roll. and in another case of amazing coincidence, i found out that the lady lab tech who comes to inspect my lab every month has a son, who was my friend in JC. how's that for an amazing coincidence!? maybe i should try an reconnect with him as well, though it's a bit more difficult since he's in NZ for work, and i don't know how long for. guess we'll let fate take its course here.
-random thought of the day: Do I want to fail?-