I would not, by any means, describe myself as a battle-hardened veteran at life. however, i think it's at least fair to say that i've had some life experience, and been through some challenging times. strangely enough, despite having gone through NS, university, and grad school, i have a disproportionately large number of bad dreams about taking the A-levels. last night, it was about the GP exam. for some reason, i'd decided not to do the essay component, and turn in a blank script. towards the last 30 minutes of the exam, i changed my mind and started panicking. by then, i had to do the AQ (application question, a mini-essay) as well, and knew that i wouldn't have time to finish both. i remember despair and panic as the predominant emotions from that dream. makes me wonder why A-levels left such an impression on me, considering that i got through just fine, and also that i've taken significantly more difficult exams since then. perhaps it's because out of all the exams i've taken, the A-levels is the one in which i performed the worst. i mean, i got a C for maths. i've never scored below a B- in university, so maybe that C is grating on me just a bit. this train of thought doesn't make much sense, though, since i failed my driving test and didn't get called for interviews for most of my job applications. so, why am i perceiving myself having failed to a greater extent for the A-levels? thankfully, it doesn't really affect me that much. while it feels bad at that point in time and just after waking up, those feelings usually clear up very quickly when i remember my current stage in life. maybe i've got to remind myself more that although i did get a C, it got me into my desired course in university, and that's good enough.
being science-trained, i do my best to think logically for all situations that i'm presented with. one of the greatest pitfalls to logical thinking is this thing called confirmation bias. i'd explain it as "looking for and accepting only what we think are the correct answers, and ignoring contradictory facts". part of a good scientific experimental protocol is to include control experiments that will eliminate this bias. but that's science. matters of the heart are just about as unscientific as one can get. so, i think you'd understand why i'm having difficulty reaching a conclusion regarding lawyer guy's orientation, just based on our interactions. most of the signs that i've picked up on point to the conclusion that he may be single and may not be straight, but that's precisely the conclusion at which i want to arrive! so, i can't trust my deduction in this case. of course, the simplest way to know for sure would just be to ask him, but that's a whole other set of complications. if it was just between the two of us, i'd probably push it a little further, but this has ramifications that will reach the entire guild. the ultimate worst case is that both of us leave the guild and never talk again, which i don't think will happen, but you never know.
it's weird, isn't it? i know that it's not worth my time to interact with people who would take issue with things like orientation. at the same time, i don't want to cause any unnecessary distress to the organization as a whole. after all, the topic of which gender i prefer to date hasn't come up in conversation, nor is it relevant to the game. i suppose that one thing that would force me to make a stand would be if there was LGBT-bashing going on, and i'm incredibly grateful that there isn't. possibly the only other situation would be if lawyer guy wants us to start dating and we have to tell the guild...but let's not get too carried away in fantasy there.
should go get ready for tuition. today's topic is inheritance, which i have to read up on as i'm not a biology person. need to go down a little earlier to mark the kids' work too. so, i guess i'd better go.
being science-trained, i do my best to think logically for all situations that i'm presented with. one of the greatest pitfalls to logical thinking is this thing called confirmation bias. i'd explain it as "looking for and accepting only what we think are the correct answers, and ignoring contradictory facts". part of a good scientific experimental protocol is to include control experiments that will eliminate this bias. but that's science. matters of the heart are just about as unscientific as one can get. so, i think you'd understand why i'm having difficulty reaching a conclusion regarding lawyer guy's orientation, just based on our interactions. most of the signs that i've picked up on point to the conclusion that he may be single and may not be straight, but that's precisely the conclusion at which i want to arrive! so, i can't trust my deduction in this case. of course, the simplest way to know for sure would just be to ask him, but that's a whole other set of complications. if it was just between the two of us, i'd probably push it a little further, but this has ramifications that will reach the entire guild. the ultimate worst case is that both of us leave the guild and never talk again, which i don't think will happen, but you never know.
it's weird, isn't it? i know that it's not worth my time to interact with people who would take issue with things like orientation. at the same time, i don't want to cause any unnecessary distress to the organization as a whole. after all, the topic of which gender i prefer to date hasn't come up in conversation, nor is it relevant to the game. i suppose that one thing that would force me to make a stand would be if there was LGBT-bashing going on, and i'm incredibly grateful that there isn't. possibly the only other situation would be if lawyer guy wants us to start dating and we have to tell the guild...but let's not get too carried away in fantasy there.
should go get ready for tuition. today's topic is inheritance, which i have to read up on as i'm not a biology person. need to go down a little earlier to mark the kids' work too. so, i guess i'd better go.
-random thought of the day: Remember to get refund for expired EZ-link card!-