Budget therapy time! i went back to read the last few chapters of the optimism book in more detail today. they did acknowledge the cultural difference issue after all, but didn't provide a solid solution. so i guess it's up to us, the people who live in those different cultures, to use the concepts from the book where we see fit in our daily lives. something else that stuck with me was that hopeless people (people who don't easily feel hope) are more prone to suicide. knowing that my hope score is reasonably high, it makes sense why i have thought about the topic of suicide and how to go about doing it, but have never thought of carrying out the act myself.
the book also claimed that our health is affected by the amount of control we think we have. if a person thinks that they're helpless, or if a person is depressed, they're more likely to suffer from illness and poor health. that might explain why my sinuses and allergies flared up so badly in 2020. i find it fascinating that different mindsets/thought patterns actually lead to a measurable/quantifiable difference in physical state.
so, since the book is called "learned optimism", it must have a way to teach optimism. and it does. it's called the ABC(DE) approach. starting with ABC, they mean: adversity - beliefs - consequences. when faced with some adversity, we justify it to ourselves with our beliefs. and the consequence of those beliefs results in our mental state, and what happens after. optimistic people don't let adversity weigh them down; they treat adversity as temporary, specific, and due to external factors. D and E stand for dispute - energization. dispute is the way to fix negative/pessimistic beliefs, and the strategies to dispute are evidence, alternatives, implications, usefulness. after the pessimistic beliefs have been disputed, energization is the new outcome, where we should ideally take steps to remedy the negative outcomes in "consequences", and/or be ready to bounce back and meet new challenges. here's where budget therapy comes in - i'm going to try and do it for my job situation (almost 2 years late). it's going to make me look bad, but i figure that i should be honest if i want to help the healing process.
adversity
i was let go from my old job. my ex-boss said that i wasn't cut out for a career in IP.
beliefs
she's great at her job and so much more experienced than me, so she definitely knows a hopeless case when she sees one. i gave her poor quality work on many occasions. i made a lot of mistakes. my peers got along so much better with their mentors and are so much better at the work than i am. i did so much overtime and was still unable to meet her expectations, so i must have been really bad.
consequences
i began to dread reviewing my work with her, to the point i felt my heart start to beat wildly whenever it was that time. i felt dumb whenever she scolded me. i didn't stand up for myself, even at the exit interview. i let this experience weigh me down for more than a year.
dispute
my colleagues have told me that my ex-boss is notorious for not being able to retain trainees (E). the ones she didn't like were quickly terminated, and the ones she liked quit after a short while (E). i may have made mistakes, but it doesn't mean i'm a bad worker. i learn from mistakes, like i do in raids (E). she just had higher expectations (A). she is responsible for training me, and while she may be a good patent attorney, that doesn't mean she's good at passing on her knowledge (I). i often walked out of our meetings with information overload, which meant that i forgot some things (E). the learning curve is unreasonably steep in that company; it has a reputation for being tough on trainees (E). the turnover is super high; more people quit before the 3-year mark than those who stay on (E). even if she's right, and i'm not cut out for a career in IP, there are other things that my science degree allows me to do (A). we only interacted for 4 months, which is hardly enough time for her to know me super-well. likewise, i know only the bare minimum about her. so it's not fair for her to say that i'm hopeless just based on these 4 months (I). it could be that our working styles clashed (A). she had her own heavy workload too, and it's natural for her to be upset if she thinks i'm not lightening it for her (A). this was just one bad experience with one company; it doesn't mean that every single company will be as harsh (I). i know friends who are thriving in other IP firms, or who have moved to an IP role in scientific companies (E).
energization
i still feel that i have untapped potential in the IP industry. as a result, i'm looking to go back into it after JET. i've started researching potential employers in australia, and working on self-improvement using the parachute book.
writing it out like that, i realize that these are all thoughts that i've had on and off. just that this format helps to give them structure and put them all in one place. something i can refer to in the future, and add any additional thoughts that may come up.
recently, i joined a discord server. its main purpose is japanese voice chat, and i figured i could get in some listening and speaking practice in a "natural" setting. so when i joined, i was asked to change my server nickname - very standard procedure. i changed it to my final fantasy character's name (it's a final fantasy community server) and thought nothing more about it. when i got on voice chat for the first time, the administrator asked how to pronounce my name, and after i told him, he said it was impossible to read in english, and went to render it in katakana. it just made me wonder...how many japanese people are bad at english because they don't (want to) make the effort to learn? my character name isn't hard to pronounce...it's basically phonetic pronunciation of the individual letters. no silent e's, weird consonant combinations, or anything like that. i actually find it weird that kids learn romaji at a young age (primary school) and yet can't break the sounds down further. example, "mi" is made of the "m" and "i" sounds. so, mi - i = m. but the kids don't see that at all. maybe i'll try incorporating that into the content this coming school year.
-random thought of the day: Received so many snacks in the past week!-