Stop me if you've heard this before - teachers aren't supposed to have favourites. that would be the case in an ideal world, but the world is far from ideal, and teachers are human after all. i mean, just take 2 students on the opposite ends of the spectrum. one engages with you, understands the content you're teaching, and makes you feel like you're making a difference. the other either can't or won't understand what you say, and doesn't appear to be trying or asking questions to bridge the gaps in their knowledge. it's not hard to choose which student i'd prefer in my class. having said that, the duty of a teacher is to treat both students equally and offer them the same opportunities to learn. whether each individual kid takes up the offer or not is out of our control. but looking inward, i also wonder if there's something else i can do to engage the latter kid in the example above. by playing to their interests, or offering some other incentive.
i can't believe i didn't think about the idea of offering incentives earlier! the brainwave struck me while i was at the primary school on tuesday. since i don't drink the carton of milk provided as part of daily school lunch, i had the bright idea to offer it as a reward to the first kid who could have a simple english conversation with me. it worked well with the primary 5 kids! not sure if other levels will be equally enthusiastic, but that's what the remaining lunchtimes in the primary school are for - to conduct experiments! don't think it'll work well in the secondary schools (not in secondary school A, at least; nobody wanted my milk even when i offered it for free!) but i'm tempted to try it in school C as well.
a thought struck me while i was helping some kids with after-school study today. the thought was that while i want them to do well, i'm not like, invested in them. and whether they do well or not doesn't affect me in any way. no, that's actually the background thought, which leads to the real thought - my teachers probably thought the same when they were teaching me! at the age of 15 or so, our view of what's important in the world is highly constrained. skewed, even. when i was 15, i think the important things in my life were trying not to get retained in sec 3, trying to make the school team in bowling, and trying to get some guys' attentions. i should try to see more things from their perspective, i think. it's not that easy, since i don't know what students in japan typically have to contend with. also, some issues aren't apparent at a superficial glance. but hey, it's only midway through year 1. i'm sure more things will reveal themselves over time.
did i mention how much i surprised myself at the after-school study thing? the kids are free to study any subject they want, so there's a wide variety. i found myself helping out in english (obviously), science (because chemical symbols are international), and to my shock, maths. numbers are also universal, but terminology is slightly different. i still don't know how to say multiply and divide in japanese. the sec 3 kids are learning about indices and surds (simple english: powers and roots), and i did what i could to help them. it surprised me, because anyone who knew me back at that time would tell you that i was (and still am, actually) hopeless at maths. so for me to be able to explain mathematical concepts, and in japanese, no less, is pretty impressive! i'm becoming more convinced that proficiency in almost everything in life is about time spent on the thing. i wish i could tell my sec 3 self about this, just to see the look on his face when i go "you know, maths isn't actually that hard". that might be a half-truth, though. calculus still kills me, as i'm sure most things maths that are JC level and above will.
just wanted to get some thoughts out of the way. the school term is ending in about a month, after which it'll be summer break. that's going to be a huge change in my schedule. but it gives me more free time, so who's complaining?
-random thought of the day: Talk a bit about pens.-

