Let's do some clarification. the story is NOT Frankenstein. i got over that quite quickly. it's something else. something that left a much more lasting impression, something that haunted me for about 10 years.
anyway, today was maths and chem. yay. maths went relatively well. but the string was tied too tightly. don't know if they were serious for deducting marks for that. other than that, some questions were left blank, but not from lack of time. just blanked out some parts. actually hyperventillated for a little while. it was *that* intense. thinking of...60+ or 70/100? maybe i can get my first a1 in maths. it's just a thought.
i got scared by Mr Lee yesterday. he said not that easy to get a1. but i thought it was easier than prelim 2. i could be grossly overconfident here, but i believe i have reason for doing so. everything was explained to the best of my ability, no slacking anywhere. except for a few where i got jammed (ie. lack of details, don't know enough) i think everything else looks wonderful. luckily i stopped to do a spot check. saved myself about 4 marks by correcting my butene structural formula. although i have a little doubt about the paper. why make something as complicated as energy change an optional question? maybe they're really going out of their way to help us. i'm going to go a little far here by predicting a 70+/80. unless they penalize for excess denied. of course, this is being ultra optimistic. don't take my word for it.
sometimes, people should be able to look through a high-power electron microscope and see the molecular thickness of the line between a suan-ing/teasing statement and something that's just plain rude. this applies to all of us, just more to the people who are guilty of this. not mentioning names here, but i think they know who they are.
geog tomorrow. will be relying on common sense again, i suppose. or not. have to do well. must at least pass, if not get >30. oh well.
anyway, today was maths and chem. yay. maths went relatively well. but the string was tied too tightly. don't know if they were serious for deducting marks for that. other than that, some questions were left blank, but not from lack of time. just blanked out some parts. actually hyperventillated for a little while. it was *that* intense. thinking of...60+ or 70/100? maybe i can get my first a1 in maths. it's just a thought.
i got scared by Mr Lee yesterday. he said not that easy to get a1. but i thought it was easier than prelim 2. i could be grossly overconfident here, but i believe i have reason for doing so. everything was explained to the best of my ability, no slacking anywhere. except for a few where i got jammed (ie. lack of details, don't know enough) i think everything else looks wonderful. luckily i stopped to do a spot check. saved myself about 4 marks by correcting my butene structural formula. although i have a little doubt about the paper. why make something as complicated as energy change an optional question? maybe they're really going out of their way to help us. i'm going to go a little far here by predicting a 70+/80. unless they penalize for excess denied. of course, this is being ultra optimistic. don't take my word for it.
sometimes, people should be able to look through a high-power electron microscope and see the molecular thickness of the line between a suan-ing/teasing statement and something that's just plain rude. this applies to all of us, just more to the people who are guilty of this. not mentioning names here, but i think they know who they are.
geog tomorrow. will be relying on common sense again, i suppose. or not. have to do well. must at least pass, if not get >30. oh well.
-thingy of the day: Everybody lies, but it doesn't matter because nobody listens.-
No comments:
Post a Comment